- Hawkes Bay, parts of Auckland and the Coromandel all still bear the scars of the worst storm to hit New Zealand this century.
- Restoring infrastructure to the way it was before a natural disaster is not necessarily the best approach for a resilient future.
- A year after Gabrielle, New Zealand needs to look to the future of climate risk, policy creation and infrastructural investment.
How frequently will it be exposed to the costs and chaos of weather events?
How should it respond to those risks?
What are the infrastructural investment priorities?
How should it sequence its responses?
And how will we pay for these measures?
Read more:
Landslides and law: Cyclone Gabrielle raises serious questions about where we've been allowed to build
Political agreement in theory
- In October 2016, the National-led government’s environment minister Paula Bennett announced the ratification of the Paris Climate Accord.
- The treaty became legally enforceable in New Zealand in 2020 while Jacinda Ardern was prime minister.
- Fundamentally, the commitment to addressing climate change is a point of agreement across the political spectrum.
- Having ratified the Paris Accord, cuts to the country’s emissions are legally enforceable and time-bound.
Can NZ ‘adapt and thrive’?
- If this is a national priority, then planning, budgeting and sequencing need to be committed to.
- Hundreds of billions of dollars will be needed over a multi-decade, integrated programme of planning, compulsory purchase and infrastructure construction.
- Read more:
NZ cities urgently need to become 'spongier' – but system change will be expensive
Time for big decisions
- If the policy is going to be reconsidered, so be it.
- But New Zealand has pressing infrastructural investment needs to facilitate growth and sustainability.
- Given the huge financial consequences, and inevitable trade-offs in social programmes, education, defence and other budget priorities, a time frame for making big decisions is essential.
John Tookey does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.