Public law

TR1: Standard form for notification of major holdings

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, November 10, 2020
European Union law, Brexit, R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, Royal prerogative, Corporate governance, Public law, Law, South African law

iii Other reason for the notification could be voluntary notifications, changes of attribution of the nature of the holding (e.g.

Key Points: 
  • iii Other reason for the notification could be voluntary notifications, changes of attribution of the nature of the holding (e.g.
  • As the disclosure of cases of acting in concert may vary due to the specific circumstances (e.g.
  • same or different total positions of the parties, entering or exiting of acting in concert by a single party) the standard form does not provide for a specific method how to notify cases of acting in concert.
  • xiii If the person subject to the notification obligation is either controlled and/or does control another undertaking then the second option applies.

MFDA Hearing Panel issues Reasons for Decision in the matter of James Hunter

Retrieved on: 
Friday, November 6, 2020
Mutual Fund Dealers Association, R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, Public law, Constitutional law, Law

TORONTO, Nov. 6, 2020 /CNW/ -A Hearing Panel of the Pacific Regional Council of the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada ("MFDA") has issued its Reasons for Decision dated November 5, 2020 ("Reasons for Decision") in connection with a settlement hearing held by electronic hearing in Vancouver, British Columbia on September 30, 2020 in the matter of James Alexander Hunter("Respondent").

Key Points: 
  • TORONTO, Nov. 6, 2020 /CNW/ -A Hearing Panel of the Pacific Regional Council of the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada ("MFDA") has issued its Reasons for Decision dated November 5, 2020 ("Reasons for Decision") in connection with a settlement hearing held by electronic hearing in Vancouver, British Columbia on September 30, 2020 in the matter of James Alexander Hunter("Respondent").
  • In its Reasons for Decision, the Hearing Panel confirmed the sanctions imposed on the Respondent.
  • A copy of the Reasons for Decision is available on the MFDA website at www.mfda.ca .
  • During the period described in the Reasons for Decision, the Respondent conducted business in the Vancouver, British Columbia area.

iAnthus Receives Notice of Appeal Regarding Court Approval for Recapitalization Transaction

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, November 5, 2020
Economy of Canada, System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval, Recapitalization, Sedar, R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, Constitutional law, Public law

The Notice of Appeal does not set out any grounds upon which the appeal is sought.

Key Points: 
  • The Notice of Appeal does not set out any grounds upon which the appeal is sought.
  • iAnthus will be responding to the appeal and in that regard, intends to deliver a Notice of Appearance on or before November 13, 2020.
  • For further details on the Court's approval for the Recapitalization Transaction, see the Company's news release dated October 6, 2020, a copy of which is available under the Company's SEDAR profile at www.sedar.com .
  • Forward-looking statements may include, without limitation, the timing and outcome of closing of the Recapitalization Transaction and the filing of the Notice of Appearance.

Notice from the Office of the Secretary - Ontario Securities Commission

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, October 20, 2020
Brexit, European Union law, R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, Royal prerogative, Constitutional law, Public law, Law in Europe

TORONTO, Oct. 20, 2020 /CNW/ - The Office of the Secretary issued a Notice of Hearing pursuant to Subsections 127(1) and 127(10) of the Securities Act.

Key Points: 

TORONTO, Oct. 20, 2020 /CNW/ - The Office of the Secretary issued a Notice of Hearing pursuant to Subsections 127(1) and 127(10) of the Securities Act.
A copy of the Notice of Hearing dated October 20, 2020 and Statement of Allegations dated October 19, 2020 are available at www.osc.gov.on.ca .

MFDA issues Notice of Settlement Hearing in respect of Christopher Shantz

Retrieved on: 
Friday, October 2, 2020
Brexit, European Union law, R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, Royal prerogative, Constitutional law, Public law

The settlement agreement will be between Staff of the MFDA and Christopher Shantz ("Respondent")and involves matters for which the Respondent may be disciplined by a Hearing Panel pursuant to MFDA By-laws.

Key Points: 
  • The settlement agreement will be between Staff of the MFDA and Christopher Shantz ("Respondent")and involves matters for which the Respondent may be disciplined by a Hearing Panel pursuant to MFDA By-laws.
  • MFDA settlement hearings are typically held in the absence of the public pursuant to section 20.5 of MFDA By-law No.
  • A copy of the Notice of Settlement Hearing is available on the MFDA website at www.mfda.ca .
  • During the period described in the Notice of Settlement Hearing, the Respondent in and around Kitchener, Ontario.

MFDA Hearing Panel issues Reasons for Decision in the matter of Jamie Leonard

Retrieved on: 
Friday, October 2, 2020
Mutual Fund Dealers Association, R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, Public law, Constitutional law, Law

TORONTO, Oct. 2, 2020 /CNW/ -A Hearing Panel of the Central Regional Council of the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada ("MFDA") has issued its Reasons for Decision dated October 2, 2020 ("Reasons for Decision") in connection with a settlement hearing held by electronic hearing in Toronto, Ontarioon June 24, 2020 in the matter of Jamie Lee Leonard ("Respondent").

Key Points: 
  • TORONTO, Oct. 2, 2020 /CNW/ -A Hearing Panel of the Central Regional Council of the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada ("MFDA") has issued its Reasons for Decision dated October 2, 2020 ("Reasons for Decision") in connection with a settlement hearing held by electronic hearing in Toronto, Ontarioon June 24, 2020 in the matter of Jamie Lee Leonard ("Respondent").
  • In its Reasons for Decision, the Hearing Panel confirmed the sanctions imposed on the Respondent.
  • A copy of the Reasons for Decision is available on the MFDA website at www.mfda.ca .
  • During the period described in the Reasons for Decision, the Respondent carried on business in the Ottawa, Ontarioarea.

MFDA Hearing Panel accepts settlement agreement with Mary Innes

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, September 24, 2020
Mutual Fund Dealers Association, R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, Public law, Constitutional law

TORONTO, Sept. 24, 2020 /CNW/ - A settlement hearing in the matter of Mary Elizabeth Innes ("Respondent") was held by electronic hearing today in Toronto, Ontario before a three-member Hearing Panel of the Central Regional Council of the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada ("MFDA").

Key Points: 
  • TORONTO, Sept. 24, 2020 /CNW/ - A settlement hearing in the matter of Mary Elizabeth Innes ("Respondent") was held by electronic hearing today in Toronto, Ontario before a three-member Hearing Panel of the Central Regional Council of the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada ("MFDA").
  • In the Settlement Agreement, the Respondent admitted that between January 2013 and October 2018, acting in her capacity as branch manager, she reviewed and approved the use of a total of 113 pre-signed and altered account forms, contrary to MFDA Rules 2.5.5(f) and 2.1.1.
  • A copy of the Settlement Agreement is available on the MFDA website at www.mfda.ca .
  • During the period described in the Settlement Agreement, the Respondent conducted business in the Bellville, Ontario area.

FDAnews Announces --17th Annual Medical Device Quality vCongress, Wednesday, Oct. 7 - Thursday, Oct. 8, 2020

Retrieved on: 
Friday, September 4, 2020
European Union directives, Medical device, MDR, Regulation (EU) 2017/745, CE marking, Food and Drug Administration, Government, Public law, Articles

Join us on Oct. 7-8 to interact virtually with FDA officials, consultants, lawyers, experts and colleagues before EU-MDR's deadline.

Key Points: 
  • Join us on Oct. 7-8 to interact virtually with FDA officials, consultants, lawyers, experts and colleagues before EU-MDR's deadline.
  • Register by Sept. 15 and save an additional 10% off the early bird savings for this premier virtual event for device quality and compliance professionals.
  • A special focus on the new EU Medical Device Regulation (EU-MDR) will ensure compliance in Europe.
  • With the Medical Device Quality vCongress taking place months before the May 2021 EU-MDR deadline, easily fine-tune plans and strengthen product positions in advance of these sweeping changes.

MFDA issues Notice of Settlement Hearing in respect of Aparna Prabhune

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, August 26, 2020
Brexit, European Union law, R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, Royal prerogative, Constitutional law, Public law

The settlement agreement will be between Staff of the MFDA and Aparna Nandkumar Prabhune ("Respondent") and involves matters for which the Respondent may be disciplined by a Hearing Panel pursuant to MFDA By-laws.

Key Points: 
  • The settlement agreement will be between Staff of the MFDA and Aparna Nandkumar Prabhune ("Respondent") and involves matters for which the Respondent may be disciplined by a Hearing Panel pursuant to MFDA By-laws.
  • MFDA settlement hearings are typically held in the absence of the public pursuant to section 20.5 of MFDA By-law No.
  • A copy of the Notice of Settlement Hearing is available on the MFDA website at www.mfda.ca .
  • During the period described in the Notice of Settlement Hearing, Respondent carries on business in the Oakville, Ontario area.

Notice from the Office of the Secretary - Ontario Securities Commission

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, August 26, 2020
Brexit, European Union law, R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, Royal prerogative, Securities Act, Public law, Law, Constitutional law

TORONTO, Aug. 26, 2020 /CNW/ -The Office of the Secretary issued a Notice of Hearing pursuant to Subsections 127(1) and 127(10) of the Securities Act.

Key Points: 

TORONTO, Aug. 26, 2020 /CNW/ -The Office of the Secretary issued a Notice of Hearing pursuant to Subsections 127(1) and 127(10) of the Securities Act.
A copy of the Notice of Hearing dated August 26, 2020 and Statement of Allegations dated August 25, 2020 are available at www.osc.gov.on.ca .