Apple Inc. litigation

Court affirms uCloudlink infringement of SIMO (Skyroam) patent

Retrieved on: 
Friday, April 19, 2019
Technology, Data management, Software, Mobile, Wireless, Professional services, Legal, Intellectual property law, Patent infringement, Apple Inc. litigation, Patent, Smartphone patent wars, TiVo Inc. v. EchoStar Corp., Patent infringement under United States law

The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York has granted a summary judgment of patent infringement claims of the holding company of Skyroam, Inc .

Key Points: 
  • The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York has granted a summary judgment of patent infringement claims of the holding company of Skyroam, Inc .
  • The Court found that products offered by UCloudLink Network Technology Limited America, brand-named GlocalMe, infringe on Skyroams patent.
  • The decision affirms what we believed all along - that UCloudlink has improperly infringed our valuable intellectual property rights.
  • SIMOs lawsuit alleges that UCloudLink infringes certain claims of US Patent 9,736,689 by selling its infringing WiFi hotspot devices in the United States.

APPLE SHAREHOLDER ALERT BY FORMER LOUISIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL: KAHN SWICK & FOTI, LLC REMINDS INVESTORS WITH LOSSES IN EXCESS OF $100,000 of Lead Plaintiff Deadline in Class Action Lawsuit Against Apple Inc. - AAPL

Retrieved on: 
Saturday, April 20, 2019
Law, Companies, Industries, Civil law, Class action, Securities regulation in the United States, Apple Inc., Apple Inc. litigation, Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. Siracusano

This action is pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

Key Points: 
  • This action is pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
  • If you wish to serve as a lead plaintiff in this class action, you must petition the Court by June 17, 2019.
  • Apple and certain of its executives are charged with failing to disclose material information during the Class Period, violating federal securities laws.
  • The case is City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System v. Apple Inc., et al., No.

TechShell, Inc. Has Filed a Lawsuit for Patent Infringement Against Max Interactive, Inc., d/b/a MAXCases

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, April 4, 2019
Intellectual property law, Law, Monopoly, Patent, Apple Inc. litigation, Case law, Smartphone patent wars, Rambus Inc. v. Nvidia, JVC Kenwood Corp. v. Nero, Inc.

TechShell alleges that MAXCases's products, including its Max Extreme Shells for laptop computers, infringe at least five of TechShell's U.S.

Key Points: 
  • TechShell alleges that MAXCases's products, including its Max Extreme Shells for laptop computers, infringe at least five of TechShell's U.S.
  • Patents and that MAXCases has induced its customers, resellers, and distributors to infringe those patents.
  • The asserted patents are directed to an exterior (protective) cover for a laptop computer and include U.S. Patent Nos.
  • TechShell filed this lawsuit to protect its U.S. patent rights.

ALJ Rules in Favor of Qualcomm in Patent Infringement Case Against Apple at the U.S. International Trade Commission

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, March 27, 2019
Companies, Industries, Economy of the United States, Apple Inc. litigation, HSA Foundation, Qualcomm, Patent, Apple Inc., Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Motorola Mobility v. Apple Inc.

The '674 patent, found to be infringed by Apple, improves power management in processor circuitry to reduce power consumption and improve battery life in mobile devices.

Key Points: 
  • The '674 patent, found to be infringed by Apple, improves power management in processor circuitry to reduce power consumption and improve battery life in mobile devices.
  • The Commission's decision is inconsistent with the recent unanimous jury verdict finding infringement of the same patent after Apple abandoned its invalidity defense at the end of trial.
  • In the past six months, courts in China and Germany have ruled that Apple is infringing additional Qualcomm non-standard essential patents and issued injunctions on infringing devices.
  • Qualcomm Incorporated includes our licensing business, QTL, and the vast majority of our patent portfolio.

Introducing Apple Card, a New Kind of Credit Card Created by Apple

Retrieved on: 
Monday, March 25, 2019
Technology, Consumer electronics, Hardware, Software, Mobile, Wireless, Professional services, Banking, Finance, IOS, Apple Inc., Computing, Operating systems, Apple Pay, Apple Store, Apple Wallet, IPhone, Face ID, Touch ID, Apple Inc. litigation, Apple ID

Apple today announced Apple Card, an innovative, new kind of credit card created by Apple and designed to help customers lead a healthier financial life.

Key Points: 
  • Apple today announced Apple Card, an innovative, new kind of credit card created by Apple and designed to help customers lead a healthier financial life.
  • View the full release here: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20190325005673/en/
    Created by Apple and designed for iPhone, Apple Card brings together Apples hardware, software and services to transform the entire credit card experience.
  • With no card number, CVV security code, expiration date or signature on the card, Apple Card is more secure than any other physical credit card.
  • Apple, the Apple logo, Apple Card, Apple Wallet, iPhone, Apple Pay, Apple Cash, Apple Store, App Store, Face ID and Touch ID are trademarks of Apple.

Qualcomm Wins Patent Infringement Case Against Apple in San Diego

Retrieved on: 
Friday, March 15, 2019
Law, Intellectual property law, Case law, Apple Inc. litigation, HSA Foundation, Qualcomm, Smartphone patent wars, Patent, Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Motorola Mobility v. Apple Inc.

The jury awarded Qualcomm $31 million in damages for infringement of the patents from July 6, 2017, the date the lawsuit was filed, through the end of the trial.

Key Points: 
  • The jury awarded Qualcomm $31 million in damages for infringement of the patents from July 6, 2017, the date the lawsuit was filed, through the end of the trial.
  • The three infringed patents cover technologies invented by Qualcomm in San Diego.
  • "The technologies invented by Qualcomm and others are what made it possible for Apple to enter the market and become so successful so quickly.
  • In the past six months, patent courts in China and Germany have ruled that Apple is infringing additional Qualcomm non-standard essential patents and issued injunctions on infringing devices.

Perfect Company Defeats Adaptics Limited's Petition for IPR Review, Further Validating Perfect's Ironclad Connected Kitchen Patents

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, March 13, 2019
Law, Intellectual property law, Apple Inc. litigation, Google litigation, Organized crime, MorphoSys, Outline of patents

On December 12, 2014, Perfect Company filed its first suit against Adaptics Ltd. for infringement of its '365 Patent.

Key Points: 
  • On December 12, 2014, Perfect Company filed its first suit against Adaptics Ltd. for infringement of its '365 Patent.
  • On November 8, 2017, Perfect Company filed a second suit against Adaptics Ltd. for infringement of its '217 Patent.
  • December 12, 2014 Perfect Company files its first suit against Adaptics Ltd. for infringement of its '365 Patent.
  • November 8, 2017 Perfect Company files a second suit against Adaptics Ltd. for infringement of its '217 Patent.

Colorado Jury Renders Verdict Of Patent Infringement Against S&H Sheet Metal, Von Honnecke And Chase Honnecke, Including Willful Infringement Finding

Retrieved on: 
Monday, February 25, 2019
Law, Apple Inc. litigation, Case law, Smartphone patent wars

(Colorado Box Company, Inc. v. Von Honnecke et al., Case No.

Key Points: 
  • (Colorado Box Company, Inc. v. Von Honnecke et al., Case No.
  • The original complaint was filed by Colorado Box Company in December, 2015, and asserted that S&H Sheet Metal, Inc., Mr.
  • Von Honnecke and Mr. Chase Honnecke infringed multiple claims of the '029 Patent, and did so willfully.
  • According to the verdict, all three accused generations of defendants' "Return Air Filter Box" directly and indirectly infringe the '029 Patent.

German Patent Court Finds Comlab’s Repeaters Infringe CommScope Patents

Retrieved on: 
Friday, February 22, 2019
Technology, Data management, Hardware, Networks, Telecommunications, Other Technology, Mobile, Wireless, VoIP, Radio electronics, Law, Carlyle Group, CommScope, Telecommunications, Repeater, Apple Inc. litigation, Patent, Case law, Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Rambus Inc. v. Nvidia

In two decisions, a German patent court has found that Comlab has infringed mobile radio transmission patents owned by Andrew Wireless Systems, an affiliate of CommScope, a global leader in infrastructure solutions for communications networks.

Key Points: 
  • In two decisions, a German patent court has found that Comlab has infringed mobile radio transmission patents owned by Andrew Wireless Systems, an affiliate of CommScope, a global leader in infrastructure solutions for communications networks.
  • The February 14 rulings by the District Court of Dsseldorf, Germany found that Comlab has infringed CommScopes European Patents EP2180605B1 and EP1022849B1.
  • The patents relate to mobile radio transmission repeaters and an apparatus for setting the gain of a repeater.
  • Two additional utility model enforcement actions are pending against Comlabs repeater systems RUD19-5 in the District Court of Dsseldorf (Action Nos.

Alphonso Prevails in Patent Dispute with Samba TV

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, January 31, 2019
Acoustic fingerprinting, Gracenote, Patent infringement, Patent, Apple Inc. litigation, Case law

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif., Jan. 31, 2019 /PRNewswire/ --TV data company Alphonso has won a major decision in a three-year patent dispute with Free Stream Media, doing business as Samba TV.

Key Points: 
  • MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif., Jan. 31, 2019 /PRNewswire/ --TV data company Alphonso has won a major decision in a three-year patent dispute with Free Stream Media, doing business as Samba TV.
  • In 2017, Samba TV was compelled to dismiss half of its patent infringement suit against Alphonso, based on a failure to provide evidence of infringement by Alphonso.
  • Separately, Alphonso is suing Samba TV in Delaware alleging Samba has infringed on two Alphonso patents, and has made false or misleading statements regarding its business relationships with smart TV companies.
  • Additionally, Nielsen Holdings' Gracenote filed a suit against Samba TV in October 2018 claiming Samba is infringing on four different Gracenote patents.