Carbon neutrality

Alter Eco Assembles Eco-Friendly Brand Coalition to Protect the Amazon Rainforest

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, September 4, 2019

Alter Eco and its Amazon Alliance partners are also part of the OSC2 , a national community of natural products industry CEOs and business leaders who work in innovative and collaborative ways toward positive environmental change.

Key Points: 
  • Alter Eco and its Amazon Alliance partners are also part of the OSC2 , a national community of natural products industry CEOs and business leaders who work in innovative and collaborative ways toward positive environmental change.
  • Alter Eco is dedicated to continuing these efforts into the future as an integral part of its growing business model.
  • All Alter Eco products are USDA Certified Organic, Fair Trade Certified, Carbon Neutral Certified and Certified Gluten-Free (excluding Dark Salt & Malt).
  • The organization was founded by Alter Eco France founder, Tristan Lecomte, to plant trees and offset the amount of CO2 produced.

HLH LLC and Kukaiau Ranch Settlement Secures Lands and Carbon Rights for HLH

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, August 28, 2019

In addition, as part of the parties agreement, Kukaiau Ranch released any and all possible claims, rights, and interest in carbon rights, carbon credits, carbon tax credits, eco-assets, eco assets, shade credits, greenhouse gas rights/credits, carbon benefits, carbon-related benefits, carbon offsets, carbon sequestration, GHG rights/credits, carbon-market rights/credits, unverified and/or verified carbon credits, unvalidated and/or validated carbon credits, global warming benefits, greenhouse gas mitigation benefits, carbon rights and/or benefits and/or credits associated with carbon sequestered by the tree branches, leaf litter and/or root systems, carbon emission reduction tons, atmospheric greenhouse gas rights, nitrogen rights, phosphorous rights, mitigation banking or other environmental commodities or derivatives created via pollution reduction, forest carbon offsets, forest carbon credits, forest carbon tax credits, and/or forest carbon tax offsets, tax credits, tax benefits, tax offsets, other tax credits, and/or any variations of these terms (collectively Carbon Credits) in and/or to any trees grown, growing, or to be grown on the leased premises belonging to HLH and/or any investor, and in and/or to any Carbon Credits arising from HLHs past, present, and/or future operations.

Key Points: 
  • In addition, as part of the parties agreement, Kukaiau Ranch released any and all possible claims, rights, and interest in carbon rights, carbon credits, carbon tax credits, eco-assets, eco assets, shade credits, greenhouse gas rights/credits, carbon benefits, carbon-related benefits, carbon offsets, carbon sequestration, GHG rights/credits, carbon-market rights/credits, unverified and/or verified carbon credits, unvalidated and/or validated carbon credits, global warming benefits, greenhouse gas mitigation benefits, carbon rights and/or benefits and/or credits associated with carbon sequestered by the tree branches, leaf litter and/or root systems, carbon emission reduction tons, atmospheric greenhouse gas rights, nitrogen rights, phosphorous rights, mitigation banking or other environmental commodities or derivatives created via pollution reduction, forest carbon offsets, forest carbon credits, forest carbon tax credits, and/or forest carbon tax offsets, tax credits, tax benefits, tax offsets, other tax credits, and/or any variations of these terms (collectively Carbon Credits) in and/or to any trees grown, growing, or to be grown on the leased premises belonging to HLH and/or any investor, and in and/or to any Carbon Credits arising from HLHs past, present, and/or future operations.
  • HLH will not be conducting eco-tours on the leased ranch lands but will continue conduct its eco-tours on its adjacent lands.
  • Finally, both HLH and Kukaiau Ranch have agreed to negotiate in good faith toward the possible sale of the fee interest in the leased land to HLH LLC.
  • We are very pleased with the negotiated resolution of the many pending issues between Kukaiau Ranch and HLH.

Cool Effect Announces One Million Tonnes of Carbon Retired

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, August 22, 2019

Cool Effect , a Bay Area based non-profit focused on fighting the climate crisis, today announced one million tonnes of carbon emissions have been retired through Cool Effects carbon reduction projects across the globe.

Key Points: 
  • Cool Effect , a Bay Area based non-profit focused on fighting the climate crisis, today announced one million tonnes of carbon emissions have been retired through Cool Effects carbon reduction projects across the globe.
  • View the full release here: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20190822005139/en/
    Richard Lawrence (left), Co-Founder of Cool Effect, a non-profit which today announced one million tonnes of carbon retired through its carbon reduction projects across the globe, inspires action through leadership in the climate space.
  • We are beyond thrilled to pass the one million tonnes retired mark, said Cool Effect Co-Founder Dee Lawrence.
  • Cool Effect continues to work toward the next million tonnes retired and beyond, by empowering all voices - individuals, organizations, and corporations - and provide them with the motivation and resources to make a difference.

Government’s target for ‘net-zero’ by 2050 undeliverable unless clean growth policies introduced

Retrieved on: 
Friday, August 23, 2019

Science and Technology Committee publishes report on Clean Growth

Key Points: 
  • The Committee welcomes the Governments decision to strengthen its long-term emissions reduction target, to effectively eliminate all emissions by 2050.
  • The Committees Report on clean growth highlights that urgent Government action is needed to reverse the current policy trend of cut backs and slow progress.

Ten key areas of shortfall

  • The Committee identifies ten key areas in which Government policy to support the implementation of low-carbon technology has been delayed, cut back or undermined carbon reductions:
    1. the 'plug-in grant' for low-emissions cars was reduced for the lowest-emissions cars in October 2018, and cut completely for other low-emissions cars
    2. fuel duty has been frozen for nine years in a row, while bus and train fares have been allowed to increase every year over the same period;
    3. the 'feed-in tariff' for low-carbon power generation was closed
    4. the Energy Companies Obligation scheme was restricted to vulnerable households in November 2018, despite the Government conceding that this would result in lower carbon emissions reductions being achieved
    5. the Government launched a consultation on how to build a market for those able to pay for their own domestic energy efficiency improvements in 2017, but has still not announced what new policy framework will emerge from the consultation responses
    6. following the cancellation of the 'zero-carbon homes' policy in 2015, the Government said that it would consult on changes to building regulations in 2019 to improve energy efficiency—but no consultation has been launched
    7. changes to business rates in 2017 have seen business rates on solar panels increase between three- and eight-fold, equating to thousands of pounds in additional costs each year for schools, SMEs and hospitals
    8. onshore wind and large-scale solar power have been excluded from the financial support mechanism available to other renewable power technologies since 2017,  and planning permission for onshore wind farms has also been made more difficult to obtain since 2015
    9. the ‘Renewable Heat Incentive’ scheme is due to close in 2021 but no replacement scheme has yet been announced
    10. the Government’s new White Paper on ‘The future of the energy market’ was due to be published in “early” 2019, but has not yet been published.

Recommendations for change

  • Ten priorities include:
    1. Strategy for decarbonising heat: The Government must urgently develop a clearer strategy for decarbonising heat. This will require large-scale trials of different heating technologies, such as heat pumps and hydrogen gas heating, operating in homes and cities to build the evidence base required for long-term decisions.
    2. Incentive scheme for energy efficiency home improvements: Previous initiatives to encourage the installation of energy efficiency improvements in the ‘able-to-pay’ market have failed because they have focused too narrowly on providing financial support for specific interventions. In order to incentivise homeowners to install energy efficiency improvements, the Government should consider adjusting Stamp Duty so that it varies according to the energy performance of the home as well as the price paid for it. Homebuyers should then be able to make energy efficiency improvements within a defined time after purchasing the property, and claim back corresponding reductions in the Stamp Duty paid retrospectively. The Government should additionally establish a ‘Help to Improve’ scheme by July 2020 that offers matched funding and interest-free loans to homeowners, to cover the costs of making energy efficiency improvements.
    3. Plan for reducing vehicle emissions: The Government must bring forward the date of its proposed ban on the sales of new ‘conventional’ cars and vans to 2035 at the latest, and ensure that it covers hybrids too. In the near-term, the Government must reconsider the fiscal incentives for consumers to purchase both new and used vehicle models with lower emissions. The Government should also work with public services and owners of public land, such as schools and hospitals, to accelerate the deployment of electric vehicle chargepoints, and introduce measures to ensure that chargepoints are interoperable, compatible with a smart energy system, reliable, and provide real-time information on their current functionality. Although ultra-low emissions vehicles generate very little emissions during use, their manufacture generates substantial emissions. In the long-term, widespread personal vehicle ownership therefore does not appear to be compatible with significant decarbonisation. The Government should not aim to achieve emissions reductions simply by replacing existing vehicles with lower-emissions versions.
    4. Support for onshore wind and solar power: The Government must ensure that there is strong policy support for new onshore wind power and large-scale solar power projects, where there is local support and projected cost-savings for consumers over the long-term. Planning consent and technological lifetimes mean that most existing onshore wind farms were expected to last 25 years before needing to be decommissioned or ‘re-powered’ with upgraded equipment. The Government should ensure that national planning policy facilitates the re-powering of existing sites, with a clear planning permission framework for re-powering existing onshore wind farms in place by the end of  2020.
    5. Review of the Smart Export Guarantee: The Government must review the functioning of the Smart Export Guarantee―the planned successor to the feed-in tariff scheme―by the end of 2020, and should be ready to include a minimum price floor if there is evidence of a lack of market competitivity—for example, if uptake of tariffs is not significantly greater than the current number of tariffs or if the tariffs offered are significantly lower than wholesale electricity prices.
    6. Sustain nuclear power without growing the industry: The Government must make a decision on the future finance framework for new nuclear power by the end of 2019. Subject to value for money, the Government should seek to support new nuclear power generation so as to sustain, but not grow, the UK’s nuclear power industry. It must anticipate any gap in future generation capacity such a policy would cause, and support sufficient renewable power alternatives to fill the gap.
    7. Removal of greenhouse gases: The Government should launch a consultation to inform the development of a future framework for managing and incentivising greenhouse gas removal on the scale required for net-zero emissions, and to provide greater certainty to encourage private investment in the development of these technologies. In line with this strategy, the Government should be ready to increase funding for research, development and demonstration of greenhouse gas removal technologies.
    8. Clear action on carbon capture, usage and storage: The Government must provide greater clarity on the details of its carbon capture, usage and storage action plan, setting out: a. what it considers to be deployment at scale; b. what constitutes cost-effectiveness or sufficient cost-reduction; c. how it expects to share costs with industry; and d. what the major milestones for the plan are, as well as when they are expected to be achieved.The Government should learn from previous carbon capture and storage projects and ensure that a sufficient number of projects, of sufficient scale, are undertaken to optimise the chance of successful deployment, and that the knowledge gained from publicly-funded work is publicly accessible.
    9. Clean growth regulation of the energy market: The Government should consider the case for amending Ofgem’s principal objective so that it explicitly includes ensuring that regulations align with the emissions reduction targets set out in the Climate Change Act 2008.
    10. Support for local authorities: The Government should support local authorities and members of the public in contributing to the UK’s net zero target. For local authorities, this should include access to low-cost, long-term finance as well as a statutory duty to develop emission reduction plans in line with the national targets set by the Climate Change Act 2008. For members of the public, the Government should publish an easily accessible central guide explaining what measures households can take to support decarbonisation and re-introduce a bespoke telephone and visiting advice service.


    Against this backdrop of policy delays and reversals, the Committee makes a series of recommendations across different sectors, including transport, heating, energy efficiency and greenhouse gas removal to get the UK ready for net-zero by 2050.

Chair's comments

    • Rt Hon Norman Lamb MP, Chair of the Science and Technology Committee, said: Parliament has declared a climate emergency.
    • The worrying effects of climate change, such as heatwaves, wildfires and flooding are already occurring at an alarming rate and will have a huge impact on future generations.
    • We need to see the Government put its words into actions.
    • The Government's own projections suggest that the UK is not currently on track to meet its current emission targets, let alone net zero by 2050.
    • If Governments across the world fail to act, it will have dire consequences for the environment and generations to come.

Further information

Government’s target for ‘net-zero’ by 2050 undeliverable unless clean growth policies introduced

Retrieved on: 
Friday, August 23, 2019

Science and Technology Committee publishes report on Clean Growth

Key Points: 
  • The Committee welcomes the Governments decision to strengthen its long-term emissions reduction target, to effectively eliminate all emissions by 2050.
  • The Committees Report on clean growth highlights that urgent Government action is needed to reverse the current policy trend of cut backs and slow progress.

Ten key areas of shortfall

  • The Committee identifies ten key areas in which Government policy to support the implementation of low-carbon technology has been delayed, cut back or undermined carbon reductions:
    1. the 'plug-in grant' for low-emissions cars was reduced for the lowest-emissions cars in October 2018, and cut completely for other low-emissions cars
    2. fuel duty has been frozen for nine years in a row, while bus and train fares have been allowed to increase every year over the same period;
    3. the 'feed-in tariff' for low-carbon power generation was closed
    4. the Energy Companies Obligation scheme was restricted to vulnerable households in November 2018, despite the Government conceding that this would result in lower carbon emissions reductions being achieved
    5. the Government launched a consultation on how to build a market for those able to pay for their own domestic energy efficiency improvements in 2017, but has still not announced what new policy framework will emerge from the consultation responses
    6. following the cancellation of the 'zero-carbon homes' policy in 2015, the Government said that it would consult on changes to building regulations in 2019 to improve energy efficiency—but no consultation has been launched
    7. changes to business rates in 2017 have seen business rates on solar panels increase between three- and eight-fold, equating to thousands of pounds in additional costs each year for schools, SMEs and hospitals
    8. onshore wind and large-scale solar power have been excluded from the financial support mechanism available to other renewable power technologies since 2017,  and planning permission for onshore wind farms has also been made more difficult to obtain since 2015
    9. the ‘Renewable Heat Incentive’ scheme is due to close in 2021 but no replacement scheme has yet been announced
    10. the Government’s new White Paper on ‘The future of the energy market’ was due to be published in “early” 2019, but has not yet been published.

Recommendations for change

  • Ten priorities include:
    1. Strategy for decarbonising heat: The Government must urgently develop a clearer strategy for decarbonising heat. This will require large-scale trials of different heating technologies, such as heat pumps and hydrogen gas heating, operating in homes and cities to build the evidence base required for long-term decisions.
    2. Incentive scheme for energy efficiency home improvements: Previous initiatives to encourage the installation of energy efficiency improvements in the ‘able-to-pay’ market have failed because they have focused too narrowly on providing financial support for specific interventions. In order to incentivise homeowners to install energy efficiency improvements, the Government should consider adjusting Stamp Duty so that it varies according to the energy performance of the home as well as the price paid for it. Homebuyers should then be able to make energy efficiency improvements within a defined time after purchasing the property, and claim back corresponding reductions in the Stamp Duty paid retrospectively. The Government should additionally establish a ‘Help to Improve’ scheme by July 2020 that offers matched funding and interest-free loans to homeowners, to cover the costs of making energy efficiency improvements.
    3. Plan for reducing vehicle emissions: The Government must bring forward the date of its proposed ban on the sales of new ‘conventional’ cars and vans to 2035 at the latest, and ensure that it covers hybrids too. In the near-term, the Government must reconsider the fiscal incentives for consumers to purchase both new and used vehicle models with lower emissions. The Government should also work with public services and owners of public land, such as schools and hospitals, to accelerate the deployment of electric vehicle chargepoints, and introduce measures to ensure that chargepoints are interoperable, compatible with a smart energy system, reliable, and provide real-time information on their current functionality. Although ultra-low emissions vehicles generate very little emissions during use, their manufacture generates substantial emissions. In the long-term, widespread personal vehicle ownership therefore does not appear to be compatible with significant decarbonisation. The Government should not aim to achieve emissions reductions simply by replacing existing vehicles with lower-emissions versions.
    4. Support for onshore wind and solar power: The Government must ensure that there is strong policy support for new onshore wind power and large-scale solar power projects, where there is local support and projected cost-savings for consumers over the long-term. Planning consent and technological lifetimes mean that most existing onshore wind farms were expected to last 25 years before needing to be decommissioned or ‘re-powered’ with upgraded equipment. The Government should ensure that national planning policy facilitates the re-powering of existing sites, with a clear planning permission framework for re-powering existing onshore wind farms in place by the end of  2020.
    5. Review of the Smart Export Guarantee: The Government must review the functioning of the Smart Export Guarantee―the planned successor to the feed-in tariff scheme―by the end of 2020, and should be ready to include a minimum price floor if there is evidence of a lack of market competitivity—for example, if uptake of tariffs is not significantly greater than the current number of tariffs or if the tariffs offered are significantly lower than wholesale electricity prices.
    6. Sustain nuclear power without growing the industry: The Government must make a decision on the future finance framework for new nuclear power by the end of 2019. Subject to value for money, the Government should seek to support new nuclear power generation so as to sustain, but not grow, the UK’s nuclear power industry. It must anticipate any gap in future generation capacity such a policy would cause, and support sufficient renewable power alternatives to fill the gap.
    7. Removal of greenhouse gases: The Government should launch a consultation to inform the development of a future framework for managing and incentivising greenhouse gas removal on the scale required for net-zero emissions, and to provide greater certainty to encourage private investment in the development of these technologies. In line with this strategy, the Government should be ready to increase funding for research, development and demonstration of greenhouse gas removal technologies.
    8. Clear action on carbon capture, usage and storage: The Government must provide greater clarity on the details of its carbon capture, usage and storage action plan, setting out: a. what it considers to be deployment at scale; b. what constitutes cost-effectiveness or sufficient cost-reduction; c. how it expects to share costs with industry; and d. what the major milestones for the plan are, as well as when they are expected to be achieved.The Government should learn from previous carbon capture and storage projects and ensure that a sufficient number of projects, of sufficient scale, are undertaken to optimise the chance of successful deployment, and that the knowledge gained from publicly-funded work is publicly accessible.
    9. Clean growth regulation of the energy market: The Government should consider the case for amending Ofgem’s principal objective so that it explicitly includes ensuring that regulations align with the emissions reduction targets set out in the Climate Change Act 2008.
    10. Support for local authorities: The Government should support local authorities and members of the public in contributing to the UK’s net zero target. For local authorities, this should include access to low-cost, long-term finance as well as a statutory duty to develop emission reduction plans in line with the national targets set by the Climate Change Act 2008. For members of the public, the Government should publish an easily accessible central guide explaining what measures households can take to support decarbonisation and re-introduce a bespoke telephone and visiting advice service.


    Against this backdrop of policy delays and reversals, the Committee makes a series of recommendations across different sectors, including transport, heating, energy efficiency and greenhouse gas removal to get the UK ready for net-zero by 2050.

Chair's comments

    • Rt Hon Norman Lamb MP, Chair of the Science and Technology Committee, said: Parliament has declared a climate emergency.
    • The worrying effects of climate change, such as heatwaves, wildfires and flooding are already occurring at an alarming rate and will have a huge impact on future generations.
    • We need to see the Government put its words into actions.
    • The Government's own projections suggest that the UK is not currently on track to meet its current emission targets, let alone net zero by 2050.
    • If Governments across the world fail to act, it will have dire consequences for the environment and generations to come.

Further information

Government’s target for ‘net-zero’ by 2050 undeliverable unless clean growth policies introduced

Retrieved on: 
Friday, August 23, 2019

Science and Technology Committee publishes report on Clean Growth

Key Points: 
  • The Committee welcomes the Governments decision to strengthen its long-term emissions reduction target, to effectively eliminate all emissions by 2050.
  • The Committees Report on clean growth highlights that urgent Government action is needed to reverse the current policy trend of cut backs and slow progress.

Ten key areas of shortfall

  • The Committee identifies ten key areas in which Government policy to support the implementation of low-carbon technology has been delayed, cut back or undermined carbon reductions:
    1. the 'plug-in grant' for low-emissions cars was reduced for the lowest-emissions cars in October 2018, and cut completely for other low-emissions cars
    2. fuel duty has been frozen for nine years in a row, while bus and train fares have been allowed to increase every year over the same period;
    3. the 'feed-in tariff' for low-carbon power generation was closed
    4. the Energy Companies Obligation scheme was restricted to vulnerable households in November 2018, despite the Government conceding that this would result in lower carbon emissions reductions being achieved
    5. the Government launched a consultation on how to build a market for those able to pay for their own domestic energy efficiency improvements in 2017, but has still not announced what new policy framework will emerge from the consultation responses
    6. following the cancellation of the 'zero-carbon homes' policy in 2015, the Government said that it would consult on changes to building regulations in 2019 to improve energy efficiency—but no consultation has been launched
    7. changes to business rates in 2017 have seen business rates on solar panels increase between three- and eight-fold, equating to thousands of pounds in additional costs each year for schools, SMEs and hospitals
    8. onshore wind and large-scale solar power have been excluded from the financial support mechanism available to other renewable power technologies since 2017,  and planning permission for onshore wind farms has also been made more difficult to obtain since 2015
    9. the ‘Renewable Heat Incentive’ scheme is due to close in 2021 but no replacement scheme has yet been announced
    10. the Government’s new White Paper on ‘The future of the energy market’ was due to be published in “early” 2019, but has not yet been published.

Recommendations for change

  • Ten priorities include:
    1. Strategy for decarbonising heat: The Government must urgently develop a clearer strategy for decarbonising heat. This will require large-scale trials of different heating technologies, such as heat pumps and hydrogen gas heating, operating in homes and cities to build the evidence base required for long-term decisions.
    2. Incentive scheme for energy efficiency home improvements: Previous initiatives to encourage the installation of energy efficiency improvements in the ‘able-to-pay’ market have failed because they have focused too narrowly on providing financial support for specific interventions. In order to incentivise homeowners to install energy efficiency improvements, the Government should consider adjusting Stamp Duty so that it varies according to the energy performance of the home as well as the price paid for it. Homebuyers should then be able to make energy efficiency improvements within a defined time after purchasing the property, and claim back corresponding reductions in the Stamp Duty paid retrospectively. The Government should additionally establish a ‘Help to Improve’ scheme by July 2020 that offers matched funding and interest-free loans to homeowners, to cover the costs of making energy efficiency improvements.
    3. Plan for reducing vehicle emissions: The Government must bring forward the date of its proposed ban on the sales of new ‘conventional’ cars and vans to 2035 at the latest, and ensure that it covers hybrids too. In the near-term, the Government must reconsider the fiscal incentives for consumers to purchase both new and used vehicle models with lower emissions. The Government should also work with public services and owners of public land, such as schools and hospitals, to accelerate the deployment of electric vehicle chargepoints, and introduce measures to ensure that chargepoints are interoperable, compatible with a smart energy system, reliable, and provide real-time information on their current functionality. Although ultra-low emissions vehicles generate very little emissions during use, their manufacture generates substantial emissions. In the long-term, widespread personal vehicle ownership therefore does not appear to be compatible with significant decarbonisation. The Government should not aim to achieve emissions reductions simply by replacing existing vehicles with lower-emissions versions.
    4. Support for onshore wind and solar power: The Government must ensure that there is strong policy support for new onshore wind power and large-scale solar power projects, where there is local support and projected cost-savings for consumers over the long-term. Planning consent and technological lifetimes mean that most existing onshore wind farms were expected to last 25 years before needing to be decommissioned or ‘re-powered’ with upgraded equipment. The Government should ensure that national planning policy facilitates the re-powering of existing sites, with a clear planning permission framework for re-powering existing onshore wind farms in place by the end of  2020.
    5. Review of the Smart Export Guarantee: The Government must review the functioning of the Smart Export Guarantee―the planned successor to the feed-in tariff scheme―by the end of 2020, and should be ready to include a minimum price floor if there is evidence of a lack of market competitivity—for example, if uptake of tariffs is not significantly greater than the current number of tariffs or if the tariffs offered are significantly lower than wholesale electricity prices.
    6. Sustain nuclear power without growing the industry: The Government must make a decision on the future finance framework for new nuclear power by the end of 2019. Subject to value for money, the Government should seek to support new nuclear power generation so as to sustain, but not grow, the UK’s nuclear power industry. It must anticipate any gap in future generation capacity such a policy would cause, and support sufficient renewable power alternatives to fill the gap.
    7. Removal of greenhouse gases: The Government should launch a consultation to inform the development of a future framework for managing and incentivising greenhouse gas removal on the scale required for net-zero emissions, and to provide greater certainty to encourage private investment in the development of these technologies. In line with this strategy, the Government should be ready to increase funding for research, development and demonstration of greenhouse gas removal technologies.
    8. Clear action on carbon capture, usage and storage: The Government must provide greater clarity on the details of its carbon capture, usage and storage action plan, setting out: a. what it considers to be deployment at scale; b. what constitutes cost-effectiveness or sufficient cost-reduction; c. how it expects to share costs with industry; and d. what the major milestones for the plan are, as well as when they are expected to be achieved.The Government should learn from previous carbon capture and storage projects and ensure that a sufficient number of projects, of sufficient scale, are undertaken to optimise the chance of successful deployment, and that the knowledge gained from publicly-funded work is publicly accessible.
    9. Clean growth regulation of the energy market: The Government should consider the case for amending Ofgem’s principal objective so that it explicitly includes ensuring that regulations align with the emissions reduction targets set out in the Climate Change Act 2008.
    10. Support for local authorities: The Government should support local authorities and members of the public in contributing to the UK’s net zero target. For local authorities, this should include access to low-cost, long-term finance as well as a statutory duty to develop emission reduction plans in line with the national targets set by the Climate Change Act 2008. For members of the public, the Government should publish an easily accessible central guide explaining what measures households can take to support decarbonisation and re-introduce a bespoke telephone and visiting advice service.


    Against this backdrop of policy delays and reversals, the Committee makes a series of recommendations across different sectors, including transport, heating, energy efficiency and greenhouse gas removal to get the UK ready for net-zero by 2050.

Chair's comments

    • Rt Hon Norman Lamb MP, Chair of the Science and Technology Committee, said: Parliament has declared a climate emergency.
    • The worrying effects of climate change, such as heatwaves, wildfires and flooding are already occurring at an alarming rate and will have a huge impact on future generations.
    • We need to see the Government put its words into actions.
    • The Government's own projections suggest that the UK is not currently on track to meet its current emission targets, let alone net zero by 2050.
    • If Governments across the world fail to act, it will have dire consequences for the environment and generations to come.

Further information

Proof Inc. celebrates 25 years as a leading North American agency

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, August 15, 2019

"The Proof family has now reached almost 200 team members across our five North American offices.

Key Points: 
  • "The Proof family has now reached almost 200 team members across our five North American offices.
  • The agency has won close to 300 awards over the years, from PRSA, CMA, CPRS, Holmes, IABC and others.
  • 2008: Became the first North American agency to be carbon neutral, further extending the agency's commitment to environmental responsibility.
  • Proof collaborates with independently owned WE Agency (formerly Waggener Edstrom), reaching more than 100 additional international markets.

Gevo’s Low Carbon, Renewable Isobutanol Program a Success in Lowering Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Seattle’s Fleet Vehicles

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, August 7, 2019

ENGLEWOOD, Colo., Aug. 07, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Gevo, Inc. (NASDAQ: GEVO) announced today the successful completion of the City of Seattle's Phase I trial pilot of fleet vehicles utilizing Gevo's low carbon, renewable drop-in isobutanol blended gasoline to reduce greenhouse gas emissions form its fleet of vehicles.

Key Points: 
  • ENGLEWOOD, Colo., Aug. 07, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Gevo, Inc. (NASDAQ: GEVO) announced today the successful completion of the City of Seattle's Phase I trial pilot of fleet vehicles utilizing Gevo's low carbon, renewable drop-in isobutanol blended gasoline to reduce greenhouse gas emissions form its fleet of vehicles.
  • The City confirmed they saw 18 metric tons of carbon reduction during the Phase I pilot trial using Gevos low carbon, renewable fuel and zero adverse effects to their fleet vehicles.
  • All fleet vehicles housed at Seattle's Cedar Falls Fleet location were moved into the program, monitored by the on-site maintenance team and used Gevos blended fuel.
  • Phillip and his team are continuously researching and implementing green fleet initiatives to reduce the City's greenhouse gas emissions.

Validated by the Science Based Targets Initiative, Stonyfield Organic Announces Goal of 30 Percent Reduction in Carbon Emissions by 2030

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, August 8, 2019

Stonyfield Organic is just one of 50 companies in North America with an approvedSBTi target; globally 232 companies have approved targets.

Key Points: 
  • Stonyfield Organic is just one of 50 companies in North America with an approvedSBTi target; globally 232 companies have approved targets.
  • "We know there is great urgency to solve climate change," said Lisa Drake, Director of Sustainability Innovation at Stonyfield Organic.
  • In addition to the agriculture sector, Stonyfield Organic's carbon reduction efforts will also focus on the areas of energy, waste, packaging and logistics.
  • 1Stonyfield commits to reduce absolute Scope 1, 2 and 3 GHG emissions 30% by 2030 from a 2017 base-year.

Liquid Wind, a Swedish Alternative Fuel Company Raises over 2 MSEK via Crowdfunding

Retrieved on: 
Monday, July 1, 2019

STOCKHOLM, July 1, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- Liquid Wind and their expert consortiumwill produce a climate neutral alternative to fossil fuels.

Key Points: 
  • STOCKHOLM, July 1, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- Liquid Wind and their expert consortiumwill produce a climate neutral alternative to fossil fuels.
  • Through combining renewable wind energy with waste carbon dioxide (CO2), Liquid Wind create a climate neutral liquid fuel which will be used as an alternative to fossil fuel and will provide an important part of the solution to reduce CO2 emissions.
  • Liquid Wind will build six plants for renewable fuel in Sweden, before expanding internationally.
  • "We are continuously looking for new investors and if you are interested in supporting Liquid Wind or finding out more, please visit www.LiquidWind.se ."