Settlement

Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Announces Proposed Class Action Settlement on Behalf of Purchasers of AppHarvest, Inc. Securities

Retrieved on: 
Monday, April 1, 2024
Claim, Appharvest, Net, Tax, District court, LLP, Pearl Street, Episcopal conference, APPH, Counsel, Settlement, Plaintiff, Action Replay, Hearing, The Honourable, Person

NEW YORK, April 1, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Levi & Korsinsky, LLP announces that the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York has approved the following announcement of a proposed class action settlement that would benefit purchasers of AppHarvest, Inc. securities (NASDAQ: APPH) and (NASDAQ: APPHW).

Key Points: 
  • NEW YORK, April 1, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Levi & Korsinsky, LLP announces that the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York has approved the following announcement of a proposed class action settlement that would benefit purchasers of AppHarvest, Inc. securities (NASDAQ: APPH) and (NASDAQ: APPHW).
  • SUMMARY NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, FINAL APPROVAL HEARING, AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPENSES
    To:      All persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired securities of AppHarvest, Inc., during the period from February 1, 2021 and August 10, 2021, inclusive, and were injured thereby (the "Settlement Class").
  • You do NOT need to attend the Settlement Hearing to receive a distribution from the Net Settlement Fund.
  • IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF THE SETTLEMENT CLASS, YOUR RIGHTS WILL BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO A MONETARY PAYMENT.

Settlement Administrator Angeion Group Announces Proposed Settlements with Brown University, University of Chicago, the Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York, Trustees of Dartmouth College, Duke University, Emory University, Northwestern

Retrieved on: 
Friday, March 29, 2024
Vanderbilt University, Tax, University, Action, Hearing, Summons, City, Emory University, University of Chicago, Class, Dartmouth College, Brown University, Fairness, Info, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, District court, Cornell University, Georgetown University, Defendant, Student, Rice, Settlement, Claim, California Institute of Technology, PC, University of Pennsylvania, Plaintiff, Trustee, School, University of Notre Dame, Columbia University, Johns Hopkins University, Pharmaceutical industry

PHILADELPHIA, March 29, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- A federal court has preliminarily approved proposed settlements ("Settlements") with the following ten defendant universities: Brown University ("Brown"), University of Chicago ("Chicago"), the Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York ("Columbia"), Trustees of Dartmouth College ("Dartmouth"), Duke University ("Duke"), Emory University ("Emory"), Northwestern University ("Northwestern"), William Marsh Rice University ("Rice"), Vanderbilt University ("Vanderbilt") and Yale University ("Yale"). The Court has also preliminarily approved a Settlement Class of students who attended the following seventeen schools (during certain time periods): Brown, California Institute of Technology, Chicago, Columbia, Cornell University, Dartmouth, Duke, Emory, Georgetown University, Johns Hopkins University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northwestern, University of Notre Dame, University of Pennsylvania, Rice, Vanderbilt, and Yale (the "Defendants," or "Universities," or "Defendant Universities"). As a part of the Settlement, the Defendant Universities have agreed to make a settlement payment of $284 million and to provide certain additional information to Plaintiffs in this antitrust class action lawsuit called Henry, et al. v. Brown University, et al., 1:22-cv-00125, pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois ("Action").

Key Points: 
  • PHILADELPHIA, March 29, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- A federal court has preliminarily approved proposed settlements ("Settlements") with the following ten defendant universities: Brown University ("Brown"), University of Chicago ("Chicago"), the Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York ("Columbia"), Trustees of Dartmouth College ("Dartmouth"), Duke University ("Duke"), Emory University ("Emory"), Northwestern University ("Northwestern"), William Marsh Rice University ("Rice"), Vanderbilt University ("Vanderbilt") and Yale University ("Yale").
  • v. Brown University, et al., 1:22-cv-00125, pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois ("Action").
  • The Action was brought by certain students who attended the Universities while receiving partial need-based financial aid.
  • The Action alleges that the Universities conspired in violation of the federal antitrust laws regarding principles, formulas, and methods of determining financial aid.

Monteverde & Associates PC and Kahn Swick & Foti LLC Announce Proposed Class Action Settlement on Behalf of All Owners of Harvest Capital Credit Corporation Common Stock

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, March 27, 2024
Order, Justice Center, ALL, Lis pendens, TIME, Prejudice, Class, Episcopal conference, THIS, HCAP, Calendar, Documentation, Internet, CLASS, Settlement, COMMON, Stipulation, HARVEST, Plaintiff, Address, Judgement, Hearing, Insurance

The purpose of this notice (the "Summary Notice") is to inform you of: (i) the class action lawsuit captioned In re Harvest Capital Credit Corporation Stockholder Litigation, pending in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (the "Court") with Civil Action Number 2021-0164-JTL (the "Action"); (ii) the proposed settlement of this Action (the "Settlement") between Plaintiffs and Defendants; and (iii) the hearing to be held by the Court in connection with the proposed Settlement.

Key Points: 
  • The purpose of this notice (the "Summary Notice") is to inform you of: (i) the class action lawsuit captioned In re Harvest Capital Credit Corporation Stockholder Litigation, pending in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (the "Court") with Civil Action Number 2021-0164-JTL (the "Action"); (ii) the proposed settlement of this Action (the "Settlement") between Plaintiffs and Defendants; and (iii) the hearing to be held by the Court in connection with the proposed Settlement.
  • If you have not received a detailed Notice of Pendency of Stockholder Class Action and Proposed Settlement, Settlement Hearing, and Right to Appear ("Notice"), you may obtain copies by writing to Harvest Capital Credit Corporation Stockholder Litigation, c/o Claims Administrator, P.O.
  • Box 4620, Portland, OR 97208-4620, 1-855-604-1813, or on the Internet at www.rg2claims.com/hcap.html .
  • No.

U.S. Merchants Enter into Landmark Class Action Settlement with Visa and Mastercard to Eliminate Anti-Competitive Restraints and Reduce Swipe Fees

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, March 26, 2024
American Express, Mastercard, Grant, Accounting, Negotiation, Network, District court, History, Policy, Judgement, Settlement, P.C, Supreme court, Competition, Ecosystem, Visa Inc., Payment card

NEW YORK, March 26, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- A landmark antitrust class action settlement has been reached between U.S. merchants and Visa Inc. ("Visa") and Mastercard Incorporated ("Mastercard") to resolve claims for injunctive relief in In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation. The settlement, which is among the largest in U.S. antitrust history, is subject to approval by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The class includes all merchants who accepted Visa or Mastercard debit or credit cards in the United States at any time during the period between December 18, 2020 and the date of entry of final judgment by the court. The class is represented by Steve Shadowen of Hilliard Shadowen LLP; Robert Eisler of Grant & Eisenhofer PA; Michael Freed of Freed Kanner London & Millen LLC; and Linda Nussbaum of Nussbaum Law Group, P.C.

Key Points: 
  • The settlement eliminates anti-competitive restraints that will deliver U.S. merchants billions of near- and long-term savings.
  • Experts expect substantially greater additional savings as the agreed upon policy changes provide merchants of all sizes with new negotiating leverage against Visa and Mastercard.
  • Importantly, the settlement prohibits Visa and Mastercard from circumventing the injunctive relief, providing strong anti-circumvention provisions and independent verification and calculations on swipe fees.
  • The settlement stems from a 2005 lawsuit which alleged that merchants paid excessive fees to accept Visa and Mastercard credit cards, and that Visa and Mastercard and their member banks acted in violation of antitrust laws.

Lowey Dannenberg, P.C. Announces an Additional Settlement for Those Who Have Transacted in Euroyen-Based Derivatives Between January 1, 2006 through June 30, 2011

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, March 21, 2024
Barclays, J. P. Morgan, Agreement, Hearing, JPMorgan Chase, E pluribus unum, HSBC (United Kingdom), HSBC Bank, HSBC, American Bankers Association, Bank, TP ICAP, Chase Bank, Singapore Exchange, UBS AG, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, Class, Lawyer, Interbank, Citibank, National Association, Person, Citigroup, Fairness, Tokyo Financial Exchange, Negotiation, GBD, Mitsubishi Group, District court, UBS, Defendant, Vexatious litigation, Knowledge, Settlement, Resona Holdings, TP, Norinchukin Bank, Shinkin Central Bank, TFX, Prior, Government, Société Générale, Plaintiff, Notice, CME, Conspiracy theory, Chicago Mercantile Exchange, ICAP, Court

The Settlement will provide an additional $35,000,000 to pay claims from persons who transacted in Euroyen-Based Derivatives from January 1, 2006 through June 30, 2011, inclusive.

Key Points: 
  • The Settlement will provide an additional $35,000,000 to pay claims from persons who transacted in Euroyen-Based Derivatives from January 1, 2006 through June 30, 2011, inclusive.
  • Before any money is paid, the Court will hold a Fairness Hearing to decide whether to approve the Settlement.
  • Contact your brokerage firm to see if you purchased, sold, held, traded, or otherwise had any interest in Euroyen-Based Derivatives.
  • These payments will also be deducted from the Settlement Fund before any distributions are made to the Settlement Class.

Simpluris Inc: If you purchased or otherwise acquired the common stock of Mohawk Industries, Inc. ("Mohawk") in the Mohawk Industries Retirement Plan 1 and/or the Mohawk Industries Retirement Plan 2 (collectively "the Plan") between April 27, 2017, and Ju

Retrieved on: 
Monday, March 18, 2024
Claim, Uncertainty, KMM, Tax, MHK, Hearing, Class, Fee, Complaint, Settlement, Counsel, Mohawk, The Plan, Plaintiff, Superior court, Fund, Multimedia, Court

COSTA MESA, Calif., March 18, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Simpluris Inc. announces that a proposed settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit known as Evans v. Mohawk Industries, Inc., Case No. N20C-01-259 KMM (the "Action"), and the Court in charge of the case is the Superior Court for the State of Delaware.

Key Points: 
  • This is a class action on behalf of all those who purchased or acquired Mohawk common stock in the Mohawk Industries Retirement Plan 1 and/or the Mohawk Industries Retirement Plan 2 (collectively "the Plan") between April 27, 2017, and July 25, 2019, (the "Class Period").
  • The Plaintiff accuses Mohawk of misrepresenting important information about its financial state in violation of certain laws, including the Securities Act of 1933.
  • To avoid the additional cost, disruption, uncertainty, and delay of continuing this lawsuit, the parties have agreed to a settlement.
  • The money remaining in the Fund after these deductions have been made is called the Net Settlement Fund.

Labaton Keller Sucharow LLP and Entwistle & Cappucci LLP Announce Notice of Pendency of Stockholder Class Actions and Proposed Settlement for All Record and Beneficial Owners of Pattern Energy Group Inc. Common Stock as of March 16, 2020

Retrieved on: 
Monday, March 18, 2024
Agreement, Justice Center, Goldman Sachs, Compromise, Mergers and acquisitions, CPP Investment Board, Federal court, Prejudice, Riverstone Holdings, Class, Episcopal conference, Eligibility, Court, Effective date, Federal, District court, Defendant, CLASS, Settlement, Net settlement, LP, Plaintiff, Notice, Judgement, Post office box, PEGI, Hearing

If you have not yet received the Notice, you may obtain a copy of the Notice by contacting the Settlement Administrator at Pattern Energy Group Inc.

Key Points: 
  • If you have not yet received the Notice, you may obtain a copy of the Notice by contacting the Settlement Administrator at Pattern Energy Group Inc.
  • Eligible Class Members do not have to submit a claim form to receive a payment from the Settlement.
  • Please do not contact the Court of Chancery or the Office of the Register in Chancery regarding this notice.
  • All questions about this notice, the proposed Settlement, or your eligibility to participate in the Settlement should be directed to the Settlement Administrator or Plaintiffs' Counsel.

Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces a Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action in the GoHealth, Inc. Securities Litigation

Retrieved on: 
Monday, March 18, 2024
COMMON, Class Action, Notice, GoHealth, District court, Defendant, ALL, Class, Person, Clerk, Judgement, CLASS, Settlement, Lawsuit, Court, Everett Dirksen, Hearing, Allocation

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AND IN ITS ENTIRETY.

Key Points: 
  • PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AND IN ITS ENTIRETY.
  • YOUR RIGHTS WILL BE AFFECTED BY A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT PENDING IN THIS COURT.
  • If the Settlement is approved it will resolve all claims in the Litigation.
  • If you purchased or otherwise acquired GoHealth Class A common stock between July 14, 2020, and January 10, 2021, inclusive, your rights may be affected by the settlement of this Litigation.

Bernstein Litowitz Berger and Grossmann LLP Announces Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action Involving Persons or Entities who Purchased or Otherwise Acquired Publicly Traded Ryder System, Inc. Common Stock During the Period from July

Retrieved on: 
Monday, March 18, 2024
Ryder, Claim, Class Action, Stipulation, System, Agreement, Prejudice, Action, Notice, Telephone, District court, Hearing, Motion, Clerk, CLASS, ARE, Settlement, Counsel, Lawsuit, Release, Person, Generic drug

Ryder System, Inc. ("Ryder") common stock during the period from July 23, 2015 through

Key Points: 
  • Ryder System, Inc. ("Ryder") common stock during the period from July 23, 2015 through
    PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY.
  • YOUR RIGHTS WILL BE AFFECTED BY A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT PENDING IN THIS COURT.
  • Certain persons and entities are excluded from the Settlement Class by definition, as set forth in the full Notice of (I) Pendency of Class Action and Proposed Settlement; (II) Settlement Hearing; and (III) Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Litigation Expenses (the "Notice"), available at www.RyderSystemSecuritiesLitigation.com .
  • YOU ARE ALSO NOTIFIED that Lead Plaintiffs in the Action, on behalf of themselves and the Settlement Class, have reached a proposed settlement of the Action for $45,000,000 in cash (the "Settlement").

Notice of Proposed Settlement Affecting All Persons who Purchased or Acquired FibroGen, Inc. Securities, Including Options, Between December 20, 2018 through July 15, 2021

Retrieved on: 
Monday, March 18, 2024
Action, Notice, District court, United States district court, Summons, PACER, Clerk, Settlement, Public access, Insurance

PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT, THE CLERK'S OFFICE, DEFENDANTS, OR DEFENDANTS' COUNSEL REGARDING THIS NOTICE, THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, OR THE CLAIMS PROCESS.

Key Points: 
  • PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT, THE CLERK'S OFFICE, DEFENDANTS, OR DEFENDANTS' COUNSEL REGARDING THIS NOTICE, THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, OR THE CLAIMS PROCESS.
  • You cannot ask the Court to order a different settlement; the Court can only approve or reject the Settlement.
  • If the Court denies approval, no settlement payments will be sent out, and the lawsuit will continue.
  • 21-cv-02623) and include all information required by the Court as detailed in the Notice.