Canada-India crisis: India's post-colonial era explains why it's on edge about Sikh separatism
Any Canadian diplomats in India past Oct. 10 are expected to lose their immunity.
- Any Canadian diplomats in India past Oct. 10 are expected to lose their immunity.
- The high-profile diplomatic crisis has confirmed rumours of longstanding tensions between the two countries over the issue of Sikh separatism in the Indian state of Punjab.
The facts so far
- Nijjar, a Canadian citizen wanted in India for alleged terrorist acts, was part of the Khalistan movement calling for a Sikh homeland separate from India’s Punjab state.
- The movement is controversial because of its organized violence against Indian officials and terrorism-motivated tactics.
- India and Canada have each expelled diplomats from their respective countries, and India has suspended visas for Canadians as the diplomatic crisis deepens.
Still to be revealed
- Trudeau has yet to reveal the “credible evidence” provided by Five Eyes linking India to the crime.
- The FBI has warned American-Sikh activists that their lives are in danger, while U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken has called on India to co-operate with Canada and ensure “accountability” over the killing.
- But that doesn’t necessarily mean the Indian government had a hand in Nijjar’s murder.
Fraught history
- India has a painful history with separatism after it gained independence from British colonialism in 1947.
- Shortly after that, diplomatic and later militaristic crisis over Jammu and Kashmir unfolded, which culminated in two wars between India and Pakistan and several armed engagements.
- The parallel rise of Naga nationalism in neighbouring Nagaland is also a thorny issue for Indian authorities.
Existential crisis
- On the other hand, India’s secessionist movements represent an existential crisis threatening everything India has worked towards for the past 76 years.
- Nijjar’s murder, however, is also a matter of grave importance for Canada.
- But both Canada and India will need to calculate the risks and repercussions of such a high-profile diplomatic rift in a highly globalized world.