Financial economics

Decomposing systemic risk: the roles of contagion and common exposures

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, April 23, 2024
Tao, CIBC, Tax, RWA, Risk, European Systemic Risk Board, Research Papers in Economics, Contagion, RT, The Big Six, NBC, International, Shock, Observation, Bank of Canada, HTC, European Economic Association, The Washington Post, Great, JPMorgan Chase, Paper, GM, Environment, Political economy, Journal of Financial Economics, COVID-19, Perception, BNS, Website, Silicon, IAT, Cifuentes, Probability, Balance sheet, RAN, Medical classification, Algorithm, Information technology, Quarterly Journal of Economics, LN, Nature, European Journal, Royal Bank of Canada, Technical report, Journal of Political Economy, Equitable Bank, Bankruptcy, RAI, PDF, Private, ECB, Policy, CHS, Supercapacitor, Social science, Journal of Financial Stability, Intelligence (journal), Elsevier, Home, Cambridge University Press, Journal, Springer Science+Business Media, Research, Classification, Regulation, News, EQB, Credit, Literature, AIK, European Central Bank, COVID, SVAR, Section 5, Management science, DRA, M4, VL, National bank, Government, ISSN, BMO, Panel, International Financial Reporting Standards, BIS, FIS, Basel III, Commerce, Scotiabank, C32, Econometric Society, Interbank, Fraud, Section 4, Bank, Schedule, VAR, Section 3, The Journal of Finance, RBC, Volcanic explosivity index, Fire, Wassily Leontief, Financial economics, Metric, Section 2, L14, Central bank, Superintendent, Bank of Montreal, Kronecker, BOC, Lithium, BCBS, Sale, Macroeconomic Dynamics, Christophe, CWB, LBC, NHA, Imperial Bank, Private equity, Quarterly Journal, National Bank of Canada, C51, Canadian Western Bank, Currency crisis, JEL classification codes, Victor Drai, L.1, MFC, Silicon Valley Bank, EB, Laurentian Bank of Canada, Federal, RA1, Series, W0, FEVD, Journal of Econometrics, Aggregate, University, FRB, MB, Financial institution, Element, Health, Book, Angels & Airwaves, Common, OSFI, GFC, Reproduction, K L, Systematic, Housing, G21, Home Capital Group, Communications satellite

Abstract

Key Points: 
    • Abstract
      We evaluate the effects of contagion and common exposure on banks? capital through
      a regression design inspired by the structural VAR literature and derived from the balance
      sheet identity.
    • Contagion can occur through direct exposures, fire sales, and market-based
      sentiment, while common exposures result from portfolio overlaps.
    • First, we document that contagion varies in time, with the highest levels
      around the Great Financial Crisis and lowest levels during the pandemic.
    • Our new framework complements
      traditional stress-tests focused on single institutions by providing a holistic view of systemic risk.
    • While existing literature presents various contagion narratives, empirical findings on
      distress propagation - a precursor to defaults - remain scarce.
    • We decompose systemic risk into three elements: contagion, common exposures, and idiosyncratic risk, all derived from banks? balance sheet identities.
    • The contagion factor encompasses both sentiment- and contractual-based elements, common exposures consider systemic
      aspects, while idiosyncratic risk encapsulates unique bank-specific risk sources.
    • Our empirical analysis of the Canadian banking system reveals the dynamic nature of contagion, with elevated levels observed during the Global Financial Crisis.
    • In conclusion, our model offers a comprehensive lens for policy intervention analysis and
      scenario evaluations on contagion and systemic risk in banking.
    • This
      notion of systemic risk implies two key components: first, systematic risks (e.g., risks related
      to common exposures) and second, contagion (i.e., an initially idiosyncratic problem becoming
      more widespread throughout the financial system) (see Caruana, 2010).
    • In this paper, we decompose systemic risk into three components: contagion, common exposures, and idiosyncratic risk.
    • First, we include contagion in three forms: sentiment-based contagion, contractual-based
      contagion, and price-mediated contagion.
    • In this context,
      portfolio overlaps create common exposures, implying that bigger overlaps make systematic
      shocks more systemic.
    • With the COVID-19 pandemic starting
      in 2020, contagion drops to all time lows, potentially related to strong fiscal and monetary
      supports.
    • That is, our
      structural model provides a framework for analyzing the impact of policy interventions and
      scenarios on different levels of contagion and systemic risk in the banking system.
    • This provides a complementary approach to
      seminal papers that took a structural approach to contagion, such as DebtRank Battiston et al.
    • More generally, the literature on networks and systemic risk started with Allen and Gale
      (2001) and Eisenberg and Noe (2001).
    • The matrix is structured as follows:
      1

      In our model, we do not distinguish between interbank liabilities and other types of liabilities.

    • In other words, we can and aim to estimate different degrees
      of contagion per asset class, i.e., potentially distinct parameters ?Ga .
    • For that, we build three major
      metrics to check: average contagion, average common exposure, and average idiosyncratic risk.
    • N i j

      et ,
      Further, we define the (N ?K) common exposure matrix as Commt = [A

      (20)

      et ]diag (?C
      ?L

      such that average common exposure reads,
      average common exposure =

      1 XX
      Commik,t .

    • N i j

      (22)

      20

      ? c ),

      The three metrics?average contagion, average common exposure, and average idiosyncratic risk?provide a comprehensive framework for understanding banking dynamics.

    • Figure 4 depicts the average level of risks per systemic risk channel: contagion risk, common exposure, and idiosyncratic risk.
    • Figure 4: Average levels of contagion (Equation (20)), common exposure (Equation (21)), and idiosyncratic risk
      (Equation (22)).
    • The market-based contagion is the contagion due to
      investors? sentiment, and the network is an estimate FEVD on volatility data.
    • For most of
      the sample, we find that contagion had a bigger impact on the variance than common exposures.

Monetary asmmetries without (and with) price stickiness

Retrieved on: 
Friday, April 19, 2024
Online, University, Public Security Section 9, Employment, Calibration, Small, Equity, Volume Ten, Research Papers in Economics, Policy, A.4, Communication, Crisis, Mass, Silvana Tenreyro, Business, Shock, Intuition, Business cycle, TFP, Volume, European Economic Review, Marginal value, SME, NBER, Forecasting, Depression, 3rd millennium, European Economic Association, Conceptual model, Journal of Monetary Economics, Insurance, Harmonization, Great Depression, CES, Economic Inquiry, Paper, Environment, Political economy, Journal of Financial Economics, MIT, University of York, COVID-19, Behavior, Review of Economic Dynamics, Rigid transformation, Website, Access to finance, Accounting, Working paper, Probability, Total, Appendix, Section 8, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Zero lower bound, Curve, Chapter, Cost, Nominal, Journal of Political Economy, Euro, PDF, ECB, Unemployment, Hoarding, STAT, Economic Policy (journal), Household, Canadian International Council, Social science, Government, Federal Reserve Bank, JEL, Journal, Textbook, Missing, Food, Private sector, A.5, Asymmetric, The Journal of Finance, Credit, Speech, Princeton University Press, Literature, NK, European Central Bank, Growth, Labour, Monetary economics, Loss aversion, Financial intermediary, Injection, Elasticity, Inventory, Subprime lending, Ben Bernanke, Finance, BIS, Phillips curve, International Economic Review, Money, London School of Economics, Marginal product of labor, Pruning, Marginal product, The Economic Journal, Rate, Aswath Damodaran, Risk, OECD, Competition (economics), Section 4, MIT Press, Consumption, Bond, Section 3, Yield curve, Loanable funds, Habit, Cobb–Douglas production function, Economy, Aarhus University, Financial economics, Section 2, Conference, Central bank, Chapter Two, Monetary policy, Capital, Hartman–Grobman theorem, CEPR, Framework, American Economic Review, Capital Markets Union, ZLB, Exercise, Liquidity, Interest, Intensive word form, Workshop, European Commission, Macroeconomic Dynamics, Population growth, B1, Response, Quarterly Journal, Community business development corporation, GDP, E31, Control, Journal of Economic Theory, Christian Social Union (UK), T2M, Hamper, Data, American Economic Journal, Aggregate, Konstantinidis, B.1, A.9, A.6, Remuneration, Civil service commission, EUR, Uncertainty, Motivation, A.7, Bank, GFC, Section 13, Motion, Reproduction, IMF, Staggers Rail Act, Abstract, Tale, Handbook, Asymmetry, Stanford University, Communications satellite

Key Points: 

    Is home bias biased? New evidence from the investment fund sector

    Retrieved on: 
    Thursday, April 18, 2024
    Rule of law, Journal of Accounting Research, Capital control, Domestic, CEPII, Research Papers in Economics, M. B, Regression analysis, Journal of International Economics, Foreign, Economic growth, Methodology, Row, International, Intuition, Risk, Heritage, Economic development, Goethe University Frankfurt, Overweight, Journal of Monetary Economics, Accounting research, International business, Paper, Political economy, Journal of Financial Economics, Environment, Website, United, Category, World Bank, Probability, Medical classification, Sun, Appendix, Handbook, G11, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Frankfurt, Institution, Investment, International economics, Journal of Political Economy, Corporation, G15, Logic, Dow Jones, PDF, Classification, ECB, CEIC, Károlyi, Policy, Outline, Household, Social science, JEL, Real, Bias, FDI, Journal, Research, Journal of Economic Literature, Credit, The Journal of Finance, Literature, Nationalization, European Central Bank, AA, Culture, Growth, Monetary economics, Section 5, Kho, Rule, Rogoff, Developed country, AAA, Finance, SHS, Control, Variable, Section 4, Language, Section 3, Role, Economy, Financial economics, Section 2, Freedom, Central bank, Incidence, Law, The Heritage Foundation, American Economic Review, Obstfeld, SSRN, Foreign direct investment, G23, Corruption, Quarterly Journal, Financial statement analysis, GDP, IMF Economic Review, Schumacher, University, MVI, Demirci, Dependent and independent variables, Lane, Common, Magazine, Bank, Reproduction, Security (finance)

    Key Points: 

      OptionMetrics Head Quantitative Researcher Garrett DeSimone Ph.D. to Give Keynote at QuantVision Conference in New York City on April 4

      Retrieved on: 
      Wednesday, April 3, 2024

      OptionMetrics Head of Quantitative Research Garrett DeSimone Ph.D. will give a keynote on Risk Neutral Factors – Implied Variance Asymmetry and Beta at Fordham’s Quantitative Conference – QuantVision – on April 4 in New York City.

      Key Points: 
      • OptionMetrics Head of Quantitative Research Garrett DeSimone Ph.D. will give a keynote on Risk Neutral Factors – Implied Variance Asymmetry and Beta at Fordham’s Quantitative Conference – QuantVision – on April 4 in New York City.
      • DeSimone, who holds a Ph.D. in Financial Economics from University of Delaware, where he served as an adjunct lecturer, will propose a new, combined factor for institutional investors to leverage in assessing risk.
      • “A common drawback of utilizing volatility as a measure to assess stocks with upside potential and risk is that it treats upside gains and downside losses as having the same relative riskiness.
      • Our research at OptionMetrics shows how integrating existing factors such as implied beta and implied variance asymmetry (IVA) into portfolio construction can provide another useful tool to assess risk,“ says DeSimone .

      Isabel Schnabel: R(ising) star?

      Retrieved on: 
      Wednesday, April 3, 2024

      This box investigates how households have responded to the 2021-23 inflationary episode using evidence from the ECB’s Consumer Expectations Survey.

      Key Points: 
      • This box investigates how households have responded to the 2021-23 inflationary episode using evidence from the ECB’s Consumer Expectations Survey.
      • The findings suggest that households have primarily adjusted their consumption spending to cope with higher inflation.

      US monetary policy is more powerful in low economic growth regimes

      Retrieved on: 
      Tuesday, April 2, 2024
      Tao, Research Papers in Economics, Excess, American Economic Journal, Doan, Policy, RT, Interpolation, Economic growth, Absorption, Business, E32, Low, Browning, European Economic Review, UST, NBER, Forecasting, Macroeconomics, European Economic Association, Journal of Monetary Economics, Journal of Applied Econometrics, TVAR, Oxford University Press, Time series, Economic Inquiry, Paper, Linearity, Joshua Angrist, Nobuhiro, Environment, Political economy, Journal of Financial Economics, Rated R, R2, Website, Emi, Energy economics, Probability, Medical classification, Eurozone, Sigismund, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Zero lower bound, History, Nature, Chapter, ZT, Journal of Political Economy, Bocconi University, OLS, Statistics, University of California, Irvine, PDF, Classification, ECB, XS, ITP, Impact, Estimation, DGP, Mark Thoma, Social science, Elsevier, JEL, Cambridge University Press, Real, M1, Research, Textbook, Private sector, FED, Credit, UTT, Literature, Federal Reserve, Knotek, Evelyn Regner, Table, European Central Bank, Chow, FRED, Monetary economics, Wald, Ben Bernanke, Premium, P500, BIS, EWMA, International Economic Review, Federal funds rate, Money, Treasury, C32, The Economic Journal, Federal Reserve Economic Data, Employment, Risk, FFR, Suggestion, FOMC, Monte Carlo method, Sigmoid, VAR, Database, Projection, Ascari, The Journal of Finance, Yield curve, United States Treasury security, Economy, Fed, Figure, NFCI, Financial economics, EXP, Freedom, Central bank, PCE, Monetary policy, American Economic Review, Exercise, Interest, Samuel, URR, Rigidity, Business cycle, XT, Landing slot, Chap, Daron Acemoglu, Markov, Blue chip, Kuttner, Response, Quarterly Journal, YT, Channel, GDP, Standard, Effect, Federal, Cost, Christian Social Union (UK), Journal of Econometrics, Comm, Mark Gertler, Use, Economic statistics, IW, Bank for International Settlements, Finance Secretary (India), UC, Bank, Reproduction, Section, News, Housing, Data, Food industry

      Key Points: 

        The impact of regulatory changes on rating behaviour

        Retrieved on: 
        Tuesday, April 2, 2024
        Długosz, Disagreement, Pi bond, Direct lending, Key, Research Papers in Economics, Finance Secretary (India), University of Oxford, STS, Journal of Economic Perspectives, International, American Economic Review, Life, Columbia Business School, British Academy of Management, Risk assessment, ABS, Rating, EBA, Development, Reputational damage, OBS, CRA, Bond credit rating, Cras, Journal of Monetary Economics, CDO, Becker, Paper, 2007–2008 financial crisis, Raja, University, Environment, Journal of Financial Economics, Perception, H3, Website, Securitization, Working paper, Market, Collection, Total, European Banking Authority, Quarterly Journal of Economics, BBB, Whetten, Column, ESMA, European Journal, Issuer, Asset quality, Information revolution, Federal Reserve Bank, OLS, Statistics, PDF, Private, ECB, Surety, Weighted-average life, CCC, European Commission, Social science, Journal of Financial Stability, JEL, Real, Bias, Journal, Research, Classification, Certification, Commission, Credit, The Journal of Finance, Literature, Karel Škréta, European Central Bank, AA, Finance Research Letters, Origination (telephony), Monetary economics, Section 5, Xia, Kraft Foods, Government, AAA, Mukherjee, Finance, Deku, DOI, White, Risk, IOSCO, MBS, OECD, Wang, Section 4, University Challenge 2013–14, Section 3, Ashcraft, Financial management, Accounting, Financial economics, Fannie Mae, Conference, Pressure, Central bank, Griffin, University of Michigan, Systematic review, EPRS, Freddie Mac, Loan, BCBS, Palgrave Macmillan, R2, Microeconomics, Quarterly Journal, Financial statement analysis, The Japanese Economic Review, Christian Social Union (UK), Green, University of Huddersfield, PSM, Management, Security (finance), Security, Civil service commission, Private placement, American Economic Journal, GFC, Reproduction, IMF, Small business, Trustee, Data

        Abstract

        Key Points: 
          • Abstract
            We examine rating behaviour after the introduction of new regulations regarding Credit Rating
            Agencies (CRAs) in the European securitisation market.
          • There is empirical evidence of rating catering in the securitisation market in the pre-GFC period (He et al.,
            2012; Efing and Hau, 2015).
          • Competition among
            CRAs could diminish ratings quality (Golan, Parlour, and Rajan, 2011) and promotes rating shopping by
            issuers resulting in rating inflation (Bolton et al., 2012).
          • This paper investigates the impact of the post-GFC regulatory changes in the European
            securitisation market.
          • In 2011, in addition to the creation of
            European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), a regulatory and supervisory body for CRAs was
            introduced.
          • We examine how rating behaviours have changed in the European securitisation market after the
            introduction of these new regulations.
          • We utilise the existence of multiple ratings and rating agreements between
            CRAs to identify the existence of rating shopping and rating catering, respectively (Griffin et al., 2013; He
            et al., 2012; 2016).
          • We find that the regulatory changes have been effective in tackling conflicts of interest between issuers
            and CRAs in the structured finance market.
          • Rating catering, which is a direct consequence of issuer and
            CRA collusion, seems to have disappeared after the introduction of these regulations.
          • There is empirical evidence of rating catering in the securitisation market in
            the pre-GFC period (He et al., 2012; Efing and Hau, 2015).
          • Competition among CRAs could diminish ratings quality (Golan, Parlour,
            and Rajan, 2011) and promotes rating shopping by issuers resulting in rating inflation (Bolton et
            al., 2012).
          • This paper investigates the impact of the post-GFC regulatory changes in the European
            securitisation market.
          • In 2011, in addition
            to the creation of European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), a regulatory and
            supervisory body for CRAs was introduced.
          • We find that the regulatory changes have been effective in tackling conflicts of interest
            between issuers and CRAs in the structured finance market.
          • Rating catering, which is a direct
            consequence of issuer and CRA collusion, seems to have disappeared after the introduction of
            these regulations.
          • Investors who previously demanded higher spreads for rating agreements for a
            multiple rated tranche, did not consider the effect of rating harmony as a risk in the post-GFC
            period.
          • Regarding rating shopping, we find that the effectiveness of the changes has been limited,
            potentially for two reasons.
          • Additionally, we also find that rating over-reliance might still be an issue, especially
            Rating catering is a broad term and it can involve rating shopping.
          • They re-examine the rating shopping and rating
            catering phenomena in the US market by looking at the post-crisis period between 2009 and 2013.
          • Using 622 CDO tranches, they also observe the existence of rating shopping and the diminishing
            of the rating catering.
          • Firstly, our main focus is the EU?s CRA Regulation and its effectiveness in reducing
            rating inflation and rating over-reliance.
          • To the best of our knowledge, this paper is the first to
            examine the effectiveness of the EU?s CRA regulatory changes on the investors? perception of
            rating inflation in the European ABS market.
          • Hence, the coverage and quality of our dataset constitutes significant addition
            to the literature and allows us to test the rating shopping and rating catering more authoritatively.
          • The following section reviews the literature
            on securitisation concerning CRAs and conflicts of interest, and outlines the regulatory changes
            introduced in the post-GFC period.
          • Firstly, ratings became ever more important as the Securities and
            Exchange Commission (SEC) 5 began heavily relying on CRA assessments for regulatory purposes
            (i.e.
          • the investment mandates that highlight rating agencies as the main benchmark for investment
            eligibility) (SEC, 2008; Kisgen and Strahan, 2010; Bolton et al., 2012).
          • issuers) as one of the main explanations for the rating inflation (He et al., 2011; 2012; Bolton
            et al., 2012; Efing and Hau, 2015).
          • Bolton et al., (2012) demonstrate that competition
            promotes rating shopping by issuers, leading to rating inflation.
          • The last phase, CRA III, was implemented in mid-2013 and involves an additional
            set of measures on reducing transparency and rating over-reliance.
          • As mentioned above, rating inflation can be caused by rating shopping
            In order to be eligible to use the STS classification, main parties (i.e.
          • The higher the difference in the number of ratings for a
            given ABS tranche, the greater the risk of rating shopping.
          • Alternatively, the impact of the new
            regulations could be limited when it comes to reducing rating shopping.
          • This is because, firstly,
            the conflict of interest between securitisation parties is not necessarily the sole cause for the
            occurrence of rating shopping.
          • L is a set of variables (Multiple ratings, CRA reported, Rating agreement) that
            we utilise interchangeably to capture the rating shopping and rating catering behaviour.
          • Hence, issuers are incentivised to report the highest possible rating and
            ensure each additional rating matches the desired level.
          • All in all, our results suggest that
            the new stricter regulatory measures have been effective in tackling conflicts of interest and
            reducing rating inflation caused by rating catering.
          • Self-selection might be a concern in analysing the impact of the
            new measures and investors? response with regard to the rating inflation.
          • This
            result is in line with the earlier findings suggesting that regulatory changes have reduced investors?
            suspicion of rating inflation and increased trust of CRAs.
          • Conclusion
            Several regulatory changes were introduced in Europe following the GFC aimed at tackling
            conflicts of interest between issuers and CRAs in the ABS market.
          • Utilising a sample of 12,469
            ABS issued between 1998 and 2018 in the European market, this paper examined whether these
            changes have had any impact on rating inflations caused by rating shopping and rating catering
            phenomena.
          • We find that the
            effectiveness of the changes has been more limited on rating shopping potentially for two reasons.
          • Tranche Credit Rating is the rating reported for a tranche at launch.

        Rover Appoints Gunnar Pedersen as Director

        Retrieved on: 
        Monday, March 11, 2024

        Vancouver, BC, Mar 11, 2024 - (ACN Newswire) - Rover Critical Minerals Corp. (TSXV:ROVR)(OTCQB:ROVMF)(FSE:4XO) (" Rover " or the " Company ") is pleased to announce the appointment of Gunnar Pedersen to the Company's Board of Directors.

        Key Points: 
        • Vancouver, BC, Mar 11, 2024 - (ACN Newswire) - Rover Critical Minerals Corp. (TSXV:ROVR)(OTCQB:ROVMF)(FSE:4XO) (" Rover " or the " Company ") is pleased to announce the appointment of Gunnar Pedersen to the Company's Board of Directors.
        • Salim Tharani has tendered his resignation as Director to accommodate the appointment of Mr. Pedersen.
        • Mr. Pedersen holds a Graduate degree in Financial Economics from the Norwegian School of Economics and is a CFA charter holder.
        • Judson Culter, CEO at Rover, states "Appointing Gunnar to our Board of Directors is part of our one-two punch strategy of bolstering our ranks.

        Philip R. Lane: Euro area international financial flows: analytical insights and measurement challenges

        Retrieved on: 
        Tuesday, February 13, 2024

        We document how gas price fluctuations have a heterogeneous pass-through to euro area prices depending on the underlying shock driving them.

        Key Points: 
        • We document how gas price fluctuations have a heterogeneous pass-through to euro area prices depending on the underlying shock driving them.
        • Supply shocks, moreover, are found to pass through to all components of euro area inflation – producer prices, wages and core inflation, which has implications for monetary policy.