Pezzullo story points to serious systemic problems in the Australian Public Service
But, just like the revelations about Robodebt from the royal commission, they must not be treated as an isolated case but as evidence of serious systemic problems in the Australian Public Service (APS).
- But, just like the revelations about Robodebt from the royal commission, they must not be treated as an isolated case but as evidence of serious systemic problems in the Australian Public Service (APS).
- So what is expected from public servants in terms of their relationship with government?
- The conduct of the public service is overseen by the public service commissioner, who issues legal directions about how bureaucrats must conduct themselves consistent with each APS Value.
- Moreover, when a person is as senior as Pezzullo, trying to distinguish between public and private behaviour is problematic.
- So trust has to be achieved across the parliament and with the Australian public.
- Public service failures in the sports rorts and Morrison multiple-ministries cases have raised a similar question.
- Another possible measure, but one not directly relevant in the Pezzullo case, is to prohibit any senior public servant from being a member of any political party.
- That might put some meat on the requirement to promote, as well as uphold, the value of impartiality.