- Perhaps you came across one in your garden and wondered at its little hands, glossy skin and what looked very much like a contented smile.
- As our research has found, the history of human-frog relations is long and complicated – and not all of it is nice.
Why we love frogs
- There is a rich history of people really loving frogs.
- This is interesting, because many people much prefer mammals and birds over reptiles and amphibians.
- Frogs are truly among the jewels of the natural world, unlike toads which – with their more mundane colours and “warty skins” – do not usually inspire the same sense of enchantment.
Dissecting human feelings for frogs
Yet relationships between people and frogs haven’t always been so positive. In fact, frogs occupy complicated places across cultures all over the world. In the Western tradition, the legacy of biblical and classical sources was both negative and longstanding. References to frogs in the Bible rendered them the instrument of divine anger as a swarming plague.
- Frogs challenged early modern zoological taxonomies, moving between classification as serpent, insect or reptile.
- In modern science, they sit in a branch of zoology, herpetology, that brings frogs together as “creeping animals” with snakes and lizards.
- Italian scientist Luigi Galvani, for example, did experiments in the late 18th century on legs of frogs to investigate what he thought of as “animal electricity”.
- In time, experiments with frogs moved beyond the laboratory into the classroom.
- In the 1930s, schoolchildren were expected to find frogs and bring them to school for dissection in biology classes.
Recognising the fragility of frogs
- From the frogs of Aesop’s Fables to the meme Pepe the Frog, we have projected our own feelings and frustrations onto frogs, and exploited them for science and education.
- Frogs have also borne the brunt of our failures as environmental stewards.
- In 2022, over 40% of amphibian species (of which frogs and toads are by far the largest group) were threatened with extinction.
Susan Broomhall receives funding from the Australian Research Council. Andrea Gaynor receives funding from the Australian Research Council. Andy Flack does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.