Legal and adminstrative bodies give evidence on off-payroll proposals

Should the responsibility, as previously considered by the OTS, for applying the rules be switched to the client?

Metadata
Provider: 
UK ParliamentUK Parliament
URL: 
http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/lords-select/economic-affairs-finance-bill-sub-committee/news-parliament-2019/3rd--evidence-session-02032020/http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/lords-select/economic-affairs-finance-bill-sub-committee/news-parliament-2019/3rd--evidence-session-02032020/
Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, March 3, 2020
Information
Tags: 
Taxation in the United Kingdom, Corporate taxation, IR35, Government, HM Revenue and Customs, Costs in English law, Economy, Tax
Summary
Key Points: 
  • Should the responsibility, as previously considered by the OTS, for applying the rules be switched to the client?
  • Will the new rules shift costs from HMRC to large- and medium-sized businesses?
  • Do you agree with the HM Treasurys claim that these rules will ensure fairness between employees and people working through Personal Service Companies?
  • Questions for the second panel will include:
    What lessons can be learnt from litigation on the IR35 rules?
Copyright: 
2020 UK Parliament. All Rights Reserved.