Federal Judge Rules PPP Data Will Remain Secret Until After Election

Federal district court judge Maxine M. Chesney has dismissed the American Small Business Leagues summary judgement motion for the release of the names of all firms that received PPP loans .

Metadata
Provider: 
Business Wire, Inc.Business Wire, Inc.
Retrieved on: 
Thursday, October 29, 2020
Information
Tags: 
Public policy, Government, Legal, White House, Federal Government, Public policy, Courts, Small business, Professional services, Congressional News, Views, Paycheck Protection Program, Chesney, Bloomberg L.P., California law, California, States of the United States
Geotags: 
United States, California
⚠generated by AI ↴
Summary
Key Points: 
  • Federal district court judge Maxine M. Chesney has dismissed the American Small Business Leagues summary judgement motion for the release of the names of all firms that received PPP loans .
  • Judge Chesney vacated the ASBLs summary judgement motion, which means that its highly unlikely that the names of firms that received PPP loans of $150,000 or less will be released before the election.
  • The Washington Post, New York Times, Dow Jones, Bloomberg LP, ProPublica and the Center for Public Integrity have also filed suit for the PPP data.
  • That case will be heard in Washington, D.C.
    ASBL anticipates that after the election the information will be released.


Federal district court judge Maxine M. Chesney has dismissed the American Small Business League’s summary judgement motion for the release of the names of all firms that received PPP loans. The ASBL has requested the information under the Freedom of Information Act. Judge Chesney vacated the ASBL’s summary judgement motion, which means that it’s highly unlikely that the names of firms that received PPP loans of $150,000 or less will be released before the election.

ASBL President Lloyd Chapman stated, “I’m very disappointed at Judge Chesney’s ruling. There’s no exemption in the Freedom of Information Act that would be applicable to this data and I think it should have been released for that reason. I suspect there’s something in this data that the Trump administration is very concerned about. That’s why they refused to release it. The Administration’s excuse of privacy doesn’t hold water because when the applicants filled out the forms, it stated that the information would be public.”

The information that has been released so far in the PPP program showed that a significant number of publicly traded companies, billionaires, and large businesses received PPP loans. ASBL estimates that legitimate small businesses, with under a hundred employees, may have received as little as three percent of the total four trillion dollars that the government has allocated for economic stimulus.

“Census Bureau data indicates 89% of all US firms have twenty employees or less. They’re responsible for 97% of all net new jobs,” Chapman continued, “and that’s who should have received the vast majority of this money. That didn’t happen and I think that’s going to result in a significant negative downturn in the middle class economy.”

The Washington Post, New York Times, Dow Jones, Bloomberg LP, ProPublica and the Center for Public Integrity have also filed suit for the PPP data. That case will be heard in Washington, D.C.

ASBL anticipates that after the election the information will be released.

www.asbl.com

www.lloydchapman.com

Copyright: 
Copyright Business Wire 2020