Why many policies to lower migration actually increase it
Distressing photos and headlines dominate front pages, and politicians stoke negative narratives about migration.
- Distressing photos and headlines dominate front pages, and politicians stoke negative narratives about migration.
- Also popular is the “cash for migration control” approach, turning countries on the edges of Europe into, effectively, “border guards”.
- One example is the EU’s recent deal with Tunisia, promising €150 million (£128 million) to boost Tunisia’s migration control efforts.
- But there is not much consensus on what the root causes of migration actually are, and little evidence to show that addressing them actually reduces migration.
Tackling the root causes
- But which ones are the most important drivers for people to take the enormous step of leaving home for somewhere new?
- The problem in migration policymaking – which often relies on intuition and guesswork, rather than evidence – is a scatter-gun approach which lists a whole range of issues as root causes.
- Corruption in hospitals, schools and police forces can be signs of low pay, inadequate management and a lack of accountability.
- Tackling corruption, therefore, can improve lives and strengthen people’s confidence to build their futures locally, rather than seeking opportunities elsewhere.
Aid and migration control
- Tackling the root causes of migration is not an easy, short-term fix to prevent migration.
- Governments allocating aid must separate this from the issue of migration, so that this money can be channelled into what it’s actually meant for: addressing economic, humanitarian, political and security issues.
Jessica Hagen-Zanker does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.